OpenLM vs JTB FlexReport
OpenLM maintains a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 4.6 out of 5. This has been possible because of our relentless efforts to provide you with the best product and support. Discover the major advantages of using OpenLM versus JTB FlexReport.
OpenLM vs JTB FlexReport:
Why choose OpenLM over JTB FlexReport?
Features
JTB FlexReport
OpenLM
Transparent pricing
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Comprehensive support for network licenses
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Diverse types of applications supported
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Support for SaaS licenses
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Cloud version
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Advanced security
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
BI Reports
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Support for 25,000+ applications
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
75+ license managers supported
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Idle license monitoring and
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
license harvesting
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
SAM integration
- OpenLM
- JTB FlexReport
Comprehensive support for network licenses
While comparing OpenLM vs JTB FlexReport, we found that JTB FlexReport offers limited support for network or floating software licenses. As per publicly available data, it is compatible with 30~ license managers. In contrast, being an ideal JTB FlexReport alternative, OpenLM supports 80+ license managers. We ensure that you can monitor all types of network licenses without investing in multiple solutions.
Comprehensive support for cloud license managers (subscriptions)
OpenLM helps you to optimize your subscription licenses with features such as options file management, directory sync, role-based access, and more. However, JTB FlexReport doesn’t have any of these features.
Multiple deployment options: Cloud and On-Premise
When it comes to deployment, OpenLM enables you to choose from our cloud and on-premise solutions. While the cloud option allows for rapid setup without requiring any additional hardware, the on-premise version facilitates a conventional, in-house SLM solution. Based on your specific business requirements, you can go for any.
In contrast, JTB FlexReport doesn’t offer this flexibility and only comes with an on-premise solution.
Integration with SAM platforms
OpenLM provides integration with leading SAM platforms like ServiceNow and License Dashboard, expanding the services beyond software license monitoring. SAM integration allows you to harness capabilities such as contract lifecycle management, asset monitoring, alerts, software metering, and more. In contrast, JTB FlexReport lacks SAM integration, resulting in the absence of these additional SAM features with their platform.
Zero tolerance for security compromises: OpenLM holds SOC 2.0 and ISO 27001 certifications
Data security is paramount at OpenLM, with no room for compromise. We continuously work towards improving our security measures. Previously, we achieved compliance with the SOC 2.0 framework, established by the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), which safeguards customer information entrusted to external service providers. Additionally, we have recently obtained the ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certification, another globally recognized framework that underscores our strategic approach to safeguarding sensitive company data, emphasizing availability, integrity, and confidentiality.
Leverage the power of license harvesting
OpenLM users can enhance efficiency by redistributing their unused licenses to the pool for other end-users, a process known as license harvesting. OpenLM enables license harvesting through various methods, including Save and Close, Suspend and Resume, Manual, and Custom.
Contrastingly, according to information available on their website, JTB FlexReport does not provide license harvesting features.
Software License Management (SLM)
Explore the full unlimited version of OpenLM for 30 days. During this time you will enjoy full support with no strings attached.
Request a demo
Disclaimer: The information provided above regarding OpenLM vs JTB FlexReport is based on interviews and research with users of relevant systems, as well as publicly available data on their respective websites. It is intended to offer a general comparison between the two platforms and highlight specific features and pricing details. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and due diligence to make informed decisions. The accuracy and relevance of the information may vary over time, and individual user experiences may differ. The text does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation of either platform and should be used as a starting point for further investigation. Should you find any inaccuracies in this page, please let us know.
